Social media and research workflow ~ Stephen’s Web

In Malartoo Rationale on February 25, 2011 by Jim Luke Tagged:

Social media and research workflowCIBER, University College London, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, February 23, 2011.As Academic Impressions summarizes this report, “A new survey shows that social scientists, humanists, and biologists — many of them frustrated by traditional publishing — are increasingly using Facebook and Twitter to share research.” The report states, “Researchers are using social media tools to support every phase of the research lifecycle: from identifying research opportunities to disseminating findings at the end. They may not be the same tools, and they are certainly not the same researchers, but social media are most definitely making an impact on scholarly workflow.”

via Social media and research workflow ~ Stephen’s Web.


The Effects of Twitter in an Online Learning Environment

In Social Media on February 19, 2011 by Jim Luke

eLearn: Feature Article – The Effects of Twitter in an Online Learning Environment.


Students Point the Way: Use Google to Replace Textbooks

In Malartoo Rationale, Open Education, Open Minds vs. Closed Content, Texts & Publishing on February 16, 2011 by Jim Luke Tagged: , ,

Student Research: Can Googling Replace $168 Intro to Psych Textbook?

  • By Dian Schaffhauser

Students are taking the battle against high-priced textbooks into their own hands. This week, 11 University of Cincinnati seniors in the psychology program presented at an Educause event a comparison of the content of traditional college texts, one of which costs $168, to content they found for free on the Web.The research effort was undertaken as part of the Digital Bookshelf Project, the University System of Ohio’s effort to make textbooks more affordable.

For the latest research project, which took place in fall 2010, the students compared the value and educational quality of two current textbooks with the draft of a new textbook they found free online, along with what they could find through online search engines. They worked under the guidance of Charles Ginn, an associate professor of psychology at U Cincinnati.

“For our generation raised on the Internet, online searches for class materials often replace purchasing the textbook,” said Libby Cates, one of the student researchers. “So, our primary research question was: Can students depend on what they find when they Google key terms? Secondly, we wanted to see what benefits are delivered through textbooks in their various forms.”

They found that materials from Wikipedia were accurate and thorough, though “perhaps excessively thorough for an introductory course,” they reported. “These summaries were equal to or exceeded those found in the two textbooks.”

Students also found that the free e-textbook and lower-cost print materials all provided similar learning support. They recommended a combination of digital and print materials as being most supportive of student learning.

The Digital Bookshelf Project has brought together psychology departments across the state to offer students electronic textbook choices from major publishers. The goal of the project is to work with the publishers and university bookstores to provide students alternatives to standard texts.

The latest research follows on a project that investigated what format students would prefer for their text. For the 2010 academic year, 50,000 of Ohio’s 70,000 introductory psychology students have had a low-cost digital option available for the textbook of their instructor’s choice.



Future Direction for Textbooks?

In Texts & Publishing on February 13, 2011 by Jim Luke Tagged: , , ,

Might multiple, short mini-books by multiple authors be a better replacement for textbooks than just making the 1000 page text monster digital?

Shorter E-Books Show Promise for Mobile Devices –


Publishers Struggle to Get Professors to Adopt Lousy, Overpriced Supplements

In Open Minds vs. Closed Content on February 12, 2011 by Jim Luke Tagged: ,

Re: Publishers Struggle to Get Professors to Use Latest E-Textbook Features – Wired Campus – The Chronicle of Higher Education.

This article really should be titled: “Poor publishers whine about how hard it is to get professors to adopt lousy, boring, e-supplements so publishers can continue over-charging students for their dinosaur business-model.”

The best part is all the comments and reactions from faculty.


OERs: the good, the bad and the ugly

In Uncategorized on February 8, 2011 by Jim Luke

Via Stephen’s Web: OERs: the good, the bad and the ugly

Tony Bates, e-learning & distance education resources, February 7, 2011.

files/images/Good-bad-and-ugly-225×300.jpg, size: 22158 bytes, type: image/jpeg A really nice post from Tony Bates on open educational resources (OERs). The theme is ‘the good, the bad and the ugly’ and we’ll get to that, but first, a nod to the motherhood statement (“open is good”) and a caveat: “the word ‘hypocrisy’ keeps coming to mind when I hear wealthy institutions pounding their chests for ‘giving away’ content that either the public through taxes or students through fees have already paid for, while their fees are such that they exclude all but the rich from their own programs and the accreditation that open content does not provide.” He had me hooked with that.

Now for the three themes:

– the good: open content is good, but it is not learning, and is best used by students as part of a wider range of educational activities, or by teachers within a broader program context

– the bad: learning resources that amount to content dumps (examples provides); “Content needs not only to be contextualized but also adapted for independent or distance learning.”

– the ugly: ” the lack of design or adaptation to make it suitable for independent or distance study or for third party use. It is as if 40 years of research on effective practice in distance learning has all been for nothing.”

via OERs: the good, the bad and the ugly ~ Stephen’s Web.


MoodleRooms Follows Bb, Signs Deal for Closed-Content

In Open Minds vs. Closed Content on February 8, 2011 by Jim Luke

Stephen Downes:

So I suppose it was inevitable that we’d see an open-source/closed-content combination. That is what appears to be happening as MoodleRooms has signed a deal with Cambridge Global Grid for Learning. Michael Feldstein explains, “as far as I can tell, this partnership is roughly similar to ones that Blackboard has previously announced with McGraw Hill and NBC.” It’s good for MoodleRooms, it’s good for the publisher. The ones who pay, of course, are the students.